You may remember that the Academy of Ancient Music, a
period-instruments group, already recorded Bach’s six Brandenburg Concertos once before, some years ago under Christopher
Hogwood. So why would they want to release another set in 2009 under the
direction of Richard Egarr? (Yes, I got
to this one a little late, but better late than..., no?) Anyway, Egarr explains
that this set of Brandenburgs differs
from most other sets in several ways: First, they chose “to present them with
one player per part, which certainly highlights the chamber aspect of the
music” and “also allows for a balanced dialogue between soloists and tutti.”
Second, they chose to adopt “what is referred to as ‘French’ Baroque pitch,
i.e. A = 392Hz. This choice is suggested by the French-model (indeed
French-played) wind instruments that dominated Bach’s area of Germany at the
time the Brandenburgs were written.
This has an extraordinary effect on the ‘richesse’ of sound in the music” and
it “alters and improves certain usually problematic balances.”
Fair enough. But are the results worthwhile with so many
other notable Brandenburg sets on the
market? I mean, just the fine ones from Pinnock (Avie and Archiv), Marriner
(Philips), Lamon (Tafelmusik or Sony), Leppard (Philips), Savall (Astree),
Hogwood (L’Oiseau-Lyre), Apollo’s Fire (Avie), and Leonhardt (Sony) could fill
a shelf. Well, obviously, that answer one can only determine for oneself, but I
can say I enjoyed this new set from Egarr, although not enough to give it a
recommendation.
You’ll also remember that Bach’s Brandenburg Concertos sound different from one another because the
composer never meant them to be a cohesive group. Margrave Christian Ludwig of
Brandenburg commissioned Bach to write several pieces for him, and what he got
a few years later from Bach was a collection of six works for various-sized
ensembles and various solo instruments that the composer had probably written
at various times for various other occasions. More’s the better for us.
Concerto No. 1
is among the longest of the Brandenburgs
and arranged for the biggest ensemble. It is also my least favorite, no matter
who is performing it. Concerto No. 2
is among the most popular of the pieces and highlights the oboe, recorder,
violin, and trumpet, the latter getting in some good playing time. Listeners
probably know Concerto No. 3 as well
as they know No. 2, maybe even more
so. Concerto No. 4 is Bach’s most
playful, with the soloists darting in and out of the structure. Concerto No. 5 is another of my personal
favorites, highlighting solos from the violin, flute, and, unusually,
harpsichord. One of the smallest ensembles, eight players, ensures a greater
clarity of sound. While Concerto No. 6
is for me the least distinctive work of the set and uses the smallest ensemble,
seven players, it never actually feels small. In fact, its only real
deficiency is its similarity to Concerto
No. 3, if usually taken at a slower speed.
The first thing that strikes me about these performances
from Richard Egarr and his AAM players is how gently they flow, how relaxed
they sound. Egarr takes his time with them in an old-fashioned sort of way,
rather than plowing through them in the quick-paced approach so favored by most
other period-instrument bands these days. It comes as a pleasant surprise, even
though it’s so different it may not be to everyone’s taste.
The lower pitch is also a surprise and goes well with the
stately tempos Egarr adopts. The “however” here is that the lower notes also
tend to thicken the sound somewhat, making it less clear and focused. The
effect may take some getting used to.
And yet another surprise is Egarr’s decision to use a
theorbo (a bass lute with two sets of strings attached to separate peg boxes,
one above the other, on the neck) as part of the continuo in five of the six
concertos. He calls the decision “a delicious luxury which I couldn’t forgo.”
Frankly, I’m not sure he needed to do it; Bach didn’t call for it, probably for
good reason, and it does rather sound a distracting note at times. It doesn’t
help with the transparency of the sonics, either.
None of which is to suggest that Egarr’s accounts of the Brandenburgs aren’t worthy of a listen.
For example, the trumpet, recorder, oboe, and violin soloists in No. 2 are quite delightful. Moreover, No. 3 proceeds at a livelier gait than
most of the others, and the players are immaculate in their articulation.
No. 4 is among
the most-charming realizations of this little concerto I’ve heard. The sound is
still a little reverberant for my liking, but it takes nothing away from the
music making.
As I had hoped, Egarr brings off No. 5 pretty well, even if the second-movement Affetuoso (affectionate, with tender warmth) drags a bit. Interestingly,
Egarr elects to use a guitar in here rather than the theorbo, and while it is
hardly noticeable, it makes a nice contribution.
Harmonia Mundi recorded the music in 2008 at St.
Jude’s-on-the-Hill, Hampstead Garden, London, for playback via a hybrid
stereo/multichannel SACD disc. The lower pitch makes the sound appear warmer
than it probably really is, and the venue seems to inflate that warmth with its
own natural hall resonance. The result, then, is a bit thick and veiled, even
played back in the disc’s SACD mode, and not as transparent as one might expect
from so small an ensemble. Oddly, too, despite the seemingly cavernous nature
of the recording environment, there is relatively little space or depth to the
sound. The harpsichord doesn’t come through very prominently, either, which may
be good or bad depending on how you feel about harpsichords. Likewise, dynamics
seem somewhat muted, possibly again because of the acoustic. Be this as it may,
the sonics are pleasing enough, and they do tend to complement the gracious
flow of Egarr’s interpretations, even when they won’t satisfy many audiophile
listeners.
