Berlioz: Symphonie fantastique (XRCD24/K2 review)

Leonard Bernstein, Orchestre National de France. Hi-Q Records HIQXRCD14.

Before we begin, I have to admit this EMI recording by Leonard Bernstein and the French National Orchestra of Berlioz’s Symphonie fantastique is not my absolute favorite performance. That honor goes to Sir Thomas Beecham and the French National Radio Orchestra, recorded some years earlier, also for EMI. However, the good news is that Bernstein’s rendition is my second-favorite performance, so even though it sightly miffs me that the audiophile label Hi-Q didn’t remaster the Beecham, I’m still glad they choose the Bernstein. They could have done worse.

French composer Hector Berlioz (1803-1869) wrote the Symphonie fantastique in 1830, and it didn’t take long to become one of the most influential pieces of music of all time. With programmatic elements similar to earlier works like Vivaldi’s Four Seasons and Beethoven’s Pastoral Symphony and using a huge orchestral arrangement for well over a hundred players (I’ve read that Berlioz employed about 130 musicians for the première), the result must have been extraordinary for its time. Nevertheless, it’s not really a traditional symphony; it’s more like a psychodrama in five movements, wherein the young Berlioz writes autobiographically of the hopeless love of a young man for a woman, the young man falling into a drug-induced dream, which the composer describes in his music. The woman reappears throughout the Symphonie in the form of an idée fixe, a “fixed idea” the young man cannot shake, a musical innovation Berlioz used to advantage and one that later composers like Richard Wagner used extensively.

In any case, Maestro Bernstein approaches the score with a sympathetic dynamism, an understanding that Berlioz was something of a wild man of music, mercurial and capricious. As these qualities underscore many of Bernstein’s own early recordings, the conductor and composer would seem to be a perfect match for one another. Some listeners, however, might prefer a more straightforward account of the music and for them I would recommend Sir Colin Davis (Philips or PentaTone), while other people might want a less-vigorous and more-atmospheric interpretation, and for them I would suggest the aforementioned Beecham. Meanwhile, we have Bernstein to consider.

Berlioz called the opening movement Reveries--Passions, describing the dejected romantic lover of the score conjuring up opium dreams and nightmares of his lost love. Bernstein's "Reveries" are more passionate than many conductors', yet for all their vigor by the close they still convey a strong spiritual conviction.

The second movement describes a ball in which the young man catches a flash of his beloved. This scene also benefits from Bernstein's emphasis on the music's contrasts. Without distorting the music, the conductor playfully captures all the shimmer and seduction of the dance and the hero's brief, tantalizing glimpse of his loved one.

After that is the scene in the country, a long, slow Adagio. In it, the young man sees a pair of shepherds playing a pipe melody to call their flock, and all is well until, as always, the young man notices his love in the picture, and the music takes a sudden turn. Here, Bernstein manages to make the music more attractive than some conductors do, never allowing it to drag or wallow in too much sentiment while still maintaining its nostalgic, melancholy tone.

Finally, we come to the two movements that audiophiles love most because they bubble over with so much busy, vigorous energy and orchestral flourish. They’re ideal for showing off one’s audio system, and what better way to do it than with an audiophile remaster. The March to the Scaffold brings the young man to his death for the murder of his beloved, and the Witches’ Sabbath finds the poor fellow at Judgment Day in hell. Bernstein generates some genuine electricity in these movements. His depiction of the hero's long green mile to the blade is deeply moving rather than jaunty or comical; moreover, he produces the most-terrifying vision of hell of any conductor I've heard. This Witches' Sabbath is downright scary. The bells! The bells!

The Hi-Q packaging is deluxe, too, the disc housed in a glossy, heavy-duty Digipak-type case, with booklet notes bound to the inside and the disc to the back cover.

EMI producer John Mordler and engineer Paul Vavasseur recorded the music at the Salle Wagram, Paris in November, 1976. Hi-Q Records, Resonance Recordings Limited, and JVC remastered and rereleased the audiophile edition of the album in 2013, using JVC’s XRCD/K2 processing system. Having the original EMI CD on hand for comparison helped in determining the sonic improvements in the Hi-Q product.

From my listening, the Hi-Q appeared more vivid, with a wider dynamic range and stronger transient impact. Those are among the qualities we generally associate with audiophile remasters, and the remaster comes closer to what one presumes is the sound of the master tape. Of course, without the master tape on hand for comparison, it's impossible to know which transfer is most accurate, but it's clear which version sounds best in the end. In this case, that would be the Hi-Q. Then the Hi-Q adds in a tighter bass, greater detail, and a smoother overall response to solidify further its dominance.  Indeed, the Hi-Q disc makes the regular EMI issue sound almost dull. I'm not entirely sure one could identify these differences with only the Hi-Q disc playing, but in a direct, side-by-side comparison they are clearly audible. Interestingly, neither version displays the best orchestral depth or midrange transparency, further conditions of the master tape, no doubt.

To listen to a brief excerpt from this album, click here:


No comments:

Post a Comment

Meet the Staff

Meet the Staff
John J. Puccio, Editor, Publisher, Reviewer

Understand, I'm just an everyday guy reacting to something I love. And I've been doing it for a very long time, my appreciation for classical music starting with the musical excerpts on the Big Jon and Sparkie radio show in the early Fifties and the purchase of my first recording, The 101 Strings Play the Classics, around 1956. In the late Sixties I began teaching high school English and Film Studies as well as becoming interested in hi-fi, my audio ambitions graduating me from a pair of AR-3 speakers to the Fulton J's recommended by The Stereophile's J. Gordon Holt. In the early Seventies, I began writing for a number of audio magazines, including Audio Excellence, Audio Forum, The Boston Audio Society Speaker, The American Record Guide, and from 1976 until 2008, The $ensible Sound, for which I served as Classical Music Editor.

Today, I'm retired from teaching and use a pair of bi-amped VMPS RM40s loudspeakers for my listening. In addition to writing the Classical Candor blog, I served as the Movie Review Editor for the Web site Movie Metropolis (formerly DVDTown) from 1997-2013. Music and movies. Life couldn't be better.
Karl W. Nehring, Contributing Reviewer

For more than 20 years I was the editor of The $ensible Sound magazine and a regular contributor to its classical review pages. I would not presume to present myself as some sort of expert on music, but I have a deep love for and appreciation of many types of music, "classical" especially, and have listened to thousands of recordings over the years, many of which still line the walls of my listening room (and occasionally spill onto the furniture and floor, much to the chagrin of my long-suffering wife). I have always taken the approach as a reviewer that what I am trying to do is simply to point out to readers that I have come across a recording that I have found of interest, a recording that I think they might appreciate my having pointed out to them. I suppose that sounds a bit simpleminded, but I know I appreciate reading reviews by others that do the same for me -- point out recordings that I think I might enjoy.

For readers who might be wondering about what kind of system I am using to do my listening, I should probably point out that I do a LOT of music listening and employ a variety of means to do so in a variety of environments, as I would imagine many music lovers also do. Starting at the more grandiose end of the scale, the system in which I do my most serious listening comprises an Arcam CDS50 CSD/SACD CD player, Goldpoint SA4 Passive Preamp, Legacy Audio PowerBloc2 amplifier, and a pair of Legacy Audio Focus SE loudspeakers. I also do a lot of listening while driving in my 2016 Acura RDX with its nice-sounding ELS Studio sound system through which I play CDs (the ones I especially like I rip to the Acura's hard drive so that I can listen to them whenever I want) or stream music through the system using my cell phone. For more casual listening at home when I am not in my listening room, I often stream music through the phone into a Vizio soundbar system that has remarkably nice sound for such a diminutive physical presence. And finally, at the least grandiose end of the scale, I have an Ultimate Ears Wonderboom Bluetooth speaker for those occasions where I am somewhere by myself without a sound system but in desperate need of a musical fix. I just can't imagine life without music and I am humbly grateful for the technology that enables us to enjoy it in so many wonderful ways.
Bryan Geyer, Technical Analyst

I initially embraced classical music in 1954 when I mistuned my car radio and heard the Heifetz recording of Mendelssohn's Violin Concerto. That inspired me to board the new "hi-fi" DIY bandwagon. In 1957 I joined one of the pioneer semiconductor makers and spent the next 32 years marketing transistors and microcircuits to military contractors. Home audio DIY projects remained a personal passion until 1989 when we created our own new photography equipment company. I later (2012) revived my interest in two channel audio when we "downsized" our life and determined that mini-monitors + paired subwoofers were a great way to mate fine music with the space constraints of condo living.

Visitors that view my technical papers on this site may wonder why they appear here, rather than on a site that features audio equipment reviews. My reason is that I tried the latter, and prefer to publish for people who actually want to listen to music; not to equipment. My focus is in describing what's technically beneficial to assure that the sound of the system will accurately replicate the source input signal (i. e. exhibit high accuracy) without inordinate cost and complexity. Conversely, most of the audiophiles of today strive to achieve sound that's euphonic, i.e. be personally satisfying. In essence, audiophiles seek sound that's consistent with their desire; the music is simply a test signal.

William (Bill) Heck, Contributing Reviewer

Among my early childhood memories are those of listening to my mother playing records (some even 78 rpm ones!) of both classical music and jazz tunes. I suppose that her love of music was transmitted genetically, and my interest was sustained by years of playing in rock bands – until I realized that this was no way to make a living. The interest in classical music was rekindled in grad school when the university FM station serving as background music for studying happened to play the Brahms First Symphony. As the work came to an end, it struck me forcibly that this was the most beautiful thing I had ever heard, and from that point on, I never looked back. This revelation was to the detriment of my studies, as I subsequently spent way too much time simply listening, but music has remained a significant part of my life. These days, although I still can tell a trumpet from a bassoon and a quarter note from a treble clef, I have to admit that I remain a nonexpert. But I do love music in general and classical music in particular, and I enjoy sharing both information and opinions about it.

The audiophile bug bit about the same time that I returned to that classical music. I’ve gone through plenty of equipment, brands from Audio Research to Yamaha, and the best of it has opened new audio insights. Along the way, I reviewed components, and occasionally recordings, for The $ensible Sound magazine. Recently I’ve rebuilt--I prefer to say reinvigorated--my audio system, with a Sangean FM HD tuner and (for the moment) an ancient Toshiba multi-format disk player serving as a transport, both feeding a NAD C 658 streaming preamp/DAC, which in turn connects to a Legacy Powerbloc2 amplifier driving my trusty Waveform Mach Solo speakers, supplemented by a Hsu Research ULS 15 Mk II subwoofer.

Mission Statement

It is the goal of Classical Candor to promote the enjoyment of classical music. Other forms of music come and go--minuets, waltzes, ragtime, blues, jazz, bebop, country-western, rock-'n'-roll, heavy metal, rap, and the rest--but classical music has been around for hundreds of years and will continue to be around for hundreds more. It's no accident that every major city in the world has one or more symphony orchestras.

When I was young, I heard it said that only intellectuals could appreciate classical music, that it required dedicated concentration to appreciate. Nonsense. I'm no intellectual, and I've always loved classical music. Anyone who's ever seen and enjoyed Disney's Fantasia or a Looney Tunes cartoon playing Rossini's William Tell Overture or Liszt's Hungarian Rhapsody No. 2 can attest to the power and joy of classical music, and that's just about everybody.

So, if Classical Candor can expand one's awareness of classical music and bring more joy to one's life, more power to it. It's done its job. --John J. Puccio

Contact Information

Readers with polite, courteous, helpful letters may send them to

Readers with impolite, discourteous, bitchy, whining, complaining, nasty, mean-spirited, unhelpful letters may send them to classicalcandor@recycle.bin.

"Their Master's Voice" by Michael Sowa

"Their Master's Voice" by Michael Sowa