Feb 5, 2014

Tchaikovsky and Mendelssohn: Piano Concertos (CD review)

Lang Lang, piano; Daniel Barenboim, Chicago Symphony Orchestra. DG B0000666-02.

An obvious word of caution: Any musical artist’s interpretation of a work is just that, an interpretation. Likewise, any music critic’s review of a performance is an opinion, a reaction to that interpretation. One cannot say either the artist’s interpretation or the critic’s reaction to it are right or wrong, correct or incorrect, in any absolute sense. One can make the case that there are virtues to every performance and leeway for reaction to every performance. If there were absolute right and wrong performances or reactions to them, we would no longer have interpretations or opinions about them; we would have truths. I mention all this because people sometimes get annoyed when a reviewer doesn’t see a performance the same way they do. And this is especially the case when the performer instills such emotions in listeners as Lang Lang does. His followers cry bloody murder when a critic disparages anything he does; his detractors cry foul when a reviewer says anything nice about him. Understand, it’s in the nature of criticism to have people agree or disagree it. It’s what opinions are all about.

Anyway, the disc under review was Chinese pianist Lang Lang’s debut recording for DG in 2003, and a daunting enterprise it was for a man just twenty-one years old. There is surely no doubting Lang’s technical keyboard expertise, but the results of the performances here are something of a mixed bag, though most of it is good.

The pianist and his accompaniment, Daniel Barenboim and the Chicago Symphony, take a bold, fast, sweeping, highly charged view of Romanticism’s most famous concerto. They get Tchaikovsky’s Piano Concerto No. 1 in B-flat minor off to its usual bang-up start from the opening chords, but then it never seems to let up through the entire first and third movements. Only in the first section of the second movement does Lang show any great degree of subtlety or repose. Otherwise, he appears to know only one speed: to charge full ahead with broad but highly controlled variations of tempo.

Nonetheless, while it’s all rather in high gear, Lang makes it work through the sheer brilliance of his virtuosity, and he gives us an intensely exciting presentation, to be sure. Still, compared to the maturity of some of his rivals--for instance, Cliburn (RCA), Giles (RCA), Argerich (DG or Philips), or Wild (Chesky), to name a few--he seems more than a little youthfully impetuous. Not that that is a bad thing, of course, and there is no question the second movement is hauntingly serene. But considering that Cliburn was about Lang’s age when he made his own famous recording, it cannot be entirely attributable to age alone.

Coupled with the Tchaikovsky is the lesser-known Mendelssohn First Piano Concerto, which I suppose DG intended as a more-relaxed and lightweight contrast to the fiery Tchaikovsky. However, the way Lang handles it, the Mendelssohn piece comes off almost as highly charged as the Russian’s. There is not as much singing rhythm or lyrical grace in the Mendelssohn as I would have liked, although there is much skillful brilliance and whizbang accomplishment.

Just as Lang’s playing will wow the crowds, so will DG’s sound turn some heads. Recorded in Chicago in 2003, it’s big and bold and reasonably clear from the opening bell, just like the performances. Still, like Lang’s interpretations, one notices almost immediately that something is just a little off. The dynamics are strong and impact is powerful, yet the piano overshadows everything else. Indeed, the piano appears to be twenty feet long and ten feet high, bigger than the orchestra behind it, while the orchestra itself produces a sound that seems slightly soft and rounded and a bit congested in the loudest passages. It sort of spoils the effect of Tchaikovsky’s biggest and most-popular melodies by almost drowning them out.

I don’t mean to seem harsh, and given Lang’s extraordinary talents I’m sure he will continue to be a dominant force in the musical world for rest of our lifetimes. However, insofar as the Tchaikovsky Piano Concerto goes, the recordings I mentioned earlier seem to me more reasonable first choices, unless you’re a die-hard Lang Lang fan or you simply have deep enough pockets to buy every new and different version of basic repertoire items that come along. Certainly, for a lot of collectors the latter argument is valid, in which case Lang Lang’s view of Tchaikovsky may be of extreme interest. Besides, who knows, you may find it a treasure.

JJP

To listen to a few brief excerpts from this album, click here:

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for your comment. It will be published after review.

Meet the Staff

Meet the Staff
John J. Puccio, Founder and Contributor

Understand, I'm just an everyday guy reacting to something I love. And I've been doing it for a very long time, my appreciation for classical music starting with the musical excerpts on the Big Jon and Sparkie radio show in the early Fifties and the purchase of my first recording, The 101 Strings Play the Classics, around 1956. In the late Sixties I began teaching high school English and Film Studies as well as becoming interested in hi-fi, my audio ambitions graduating me from a pair of AR-3 speakers to the Fulton J's recommended by The Stereophile's J. Gordon Holt. In the early Seventies, I began writing for a number of audio magazines, including Audio Excellence, Audio Forum, The Boston Audio Society Speaker, The American Record Guide, and from 1976 until 2008, The $ensible Sound, for which I served as Classical Music Editor.

Today, I'm retired from teaching and use a pair of bi-amped VMPS RM40s loudspeakers for my listening. In addition to writing for the Classical Candor blog, I served as the Movie Review Editor for the Web site Movie Metropolis (formerly DVDTown) from 1997-2013. Music and movies. Life couldn't be better.

Karl Nehring, Editor and Contributor

For more than 20 years I was the editor of The $ensible Sound magazine and a regular contributor to both its equipment and recordings review pages. I would not presume to present myself as some sort of expert on music, but I have a deep love for and appreciation of many types of music, "classical" especially, and have listened to thousands of recordings over the years, many of which still line the walls of my listening room (and occasionally spill onto the furniture and floor, much to the chagrin of my long-suffering wife). I have always taken the approach as a reviewer that what I am trying to do is simply to point out to readers that I have come across a recording that I have found of interest, a recording that I think they might appreciate my having pointed out to them. I suppose that sounds a bit simple-minded, but I know I appreciate reading reviews by others that do the same for me — point out recordings that they think I might enjoy.

For readers who might be wondering about what kind of system I am using to do my listening, I should probably point out that I do a LOT of music listening and employ a variety of means to do so in a variety of environments, as I would imagine many music lovers also do. Starting at the more grandiose end of the scale, the system in which I do my most serious listening comprises Marantz CD 6007 and Onkyo CD 7030 CD players, NAD C 658 streaming preamp/DAC, Legacy Audio PowerBloc2 amplifier, and a pair of Legacy Audio Focus SE loudspeakers. I occasionally do some listening through pair of Sennheiser 560S headphones. I miss the excellent ELS Studio sound system in our 2016 Acura RDX (now my wife's daily driver) on which I had ripped more than a hundred favorite CDs to the hard drive, so now when driving my 2022 Accord EX-L Hybrid I stream music from my phone through its adequate but not outstanding factory system. For more casual listening at home when I am not in my listening room, I often stream music through the phone into a Vizio soundbar system that has tolerably nice sound for such a diminutive physical presence. And finally, at the least grandiose end of the scale, I have an Ultimate Ears Wonderboom II Bluetooth speaker for those occasions where I am somewhere by myself without a sound system but in desperate need of a musical fix. I just can’t imagine life without music and I am humbly grateful for the technology that enables us to enjoy it in so many wonderful ways.

William (Bill) Heck, Webmaster and Contributor

Among my early childhood memories are those of listening to my mother playing records (some even 78 rpm ones!) of both classical music and jazz tunes. I suppose that her love of music was transmitted genetically, and my interest was sustained by years of playing in rock bands – until I realized that this was no way to make a living. The interest in classical music was rekindled in grad school when the university FM station serving as background music for studying happened to play the Brahms First Symphony. As the work came to an end, it struck me forcibly that this was the most beautiful thing I had ever heard, and from that point on, I never looked back. This revelation was to the detriment of my studies, as I subsequently spent way too much time simply listening, but music has remained a significant part of my life. These days, although I still can tell a trumpet from a bassoon and a quarter note from a treble clef, I have to admit that I remain a nonexpert. But I do love music in general and classical music in particular, and I enjoy sharing both information and opinions about it.

The audiophile bug bit about the same time that I returned to classical music. I’ve gone through plenty of equipment, brands from Audio Research to Yamaha, and the best of it has opened new audio insights. Along the way, I reviewed components, and occasionally recordings, for The $ensible Sound magazine. Most recently I’ve moved to my “ultimate system” consisting of a BlueSound Node streamer, an ancient Toshiba multi-format disk player serving as a CD transport, Legacy Wavelet II DAC/preamp/crossover, dual Legacy PowerBloc2 amps, and Legacy Signature SE speakers (biamped), all connected with decently made, no-frills cables. With the arrival of CD and higher resolution streaming, that is now the source for most of my listening.

Ryan Ross, Contributor

I started listening to and studying classical music in earnest nearly three decades ago. This interest grew naturally out of my training as a pianist. I am now a musicologist by profession, specializing in British and other symphonic music of the 19th and 20th centuries. My scholarly work has been published in major music journals, as well as in other outlets. Current research focuses include twentieth-century symphonic historiography, and the music of Jean Sibelius, Ralph Vaughan Williams, and Malcolm Arnold.

I am honored to contribute writings to Classical Candor. In an age where the classical recording industry is being subjected to such profound pressures and changes, it is more important than ever for those of us steeped in this cultural tradition to continue to foster its love and exposure. I hope that my readers can find value, no matter how modest, in what I offer here.


Bryan Geyer, Technical Analyst

I initially embraced classical music in 1954 when I mistuned my car radio and heard the Heifetz recording of Mendelssohn's Violin Concerto. That inspired me to board the new "hi-fi" DIY bandwagon. In 1957 I joined one of the pioneer semiconductor makers and spent the next 32 years marketing transistors and microcircuits to military contractors. Home audio DIY projects remained a personal passion until 1989 when we created our own new photography equipment company. I later (2012) revived my interest in two channel audio when we "downsized" our life and determined that mini-monitors + paired subwoofers were a great way to mate fine music with the space constraints of condo living.

Visitors that view my technical papers on this site may wonder why they appear here, rather than on a site that features audio equipment reviews. My reason is that I tried the latter, and prefer to publish for people who actually want to listen to music; not to equipment. My focus is in describing what's technically beneficial to assure that the sound of the system will accurately replicate the source input signal (i. e. exhibit high accuracy) without inordinate cost and complexity. Conversely, most of the audiophiles of today strive to achieve sound that's euphonic, i.e. be personally satisfying. In essence, audiophiles seek sound that's consistent with their desire; the music is simply a test signal.

Mission Statement

It is the goal of Classical Candor to promote the enjoyment of classical music. Other forms of music come and go--minuets, waltzes, ragtime, blues, jazz, bebop, country-western, rock-'n'-roll, heavy metal, rap, and the rest--but classical music has been around for hundreds of years and will continue to be around for hundreds more. It's no accident that every major city in the world has one or more symphony orchestras.

When I was young, I heard it said that only intellectuals could appreciate classical music, that it required dedicated concentration to appreciate. Nonsense. I'm no intellectual, and I've always loved classical music. Anyone who's ever seen and enjoyed Disney's Fantasia or a Looney Tunes cartoon playing Rossini's William Tell Overture or Liszt's Hungarian Rhapsody No. 2 can attest to the power and joy of classical music, and that's just about everybody.

So, if Classical Candor can expand one's awareness of classical music and bring more joy to one's life, more power to it. It's done its job. --John J. Puccio

Contact Information

Readers with polite, courteous, helpful letters may send them to classicalcandor@gmail.com

Readers with impolite, discourteous, bitchy, whining, complaining, nasty, mean-spirited, unhelpful letters may send them to classicalcandor@recycle.bin.

"Their Master's Voice" by Michael Sowa

"Their Master's Voice" by Michael Sowa