Also, Triple Concertos, BWV 1044 and 1064. Peter Schreier, CPE Bach Chamber Orchestra. Newton Classics 8802075 (2-disc set).
Newton Classics is the record company that reissues older material and releases it on fresh new discs. Usually, they choose recordings of critical or popular distinction that for whatever reason have gone out of print. In the case of conductor Peter Schreier's performances of Bach's six Brandenburg Concertos with the CPE Bach Chamber Orchestra, originally a Philips set from 1993, the case seems a little different. It's a recording that initially went by without much notice from the critics or the public. My own recollection of it had been one of indifference. Listening to it again in this 2011 Newton re-release, I can understand my lack of interest back then.
You will recall that the six Brandenburgs sound different from one another because J.S. Bach never intended they be played as a group, as a unified cycle. In fact, Bach himself called them "concerts," and it wasn't until the mid nineteenth century that people began referring to them as "concertos." Margrave Christian Ludwig of Brandenburg commissioned Bach to write several pieces for him, and what he got a few years later was the collection of six works we know today as the Brandenburg Concertos, the pieces written for various-sized groups and various solo instruments that Bach had probably composed at various times for various other occasions.
Concerto No. 1 is among the lengthiest of the Brandenburgs, four movements (in the French style) rather than three, and Bach arranged it for the biggest ensemble. It's also my least favorite. Under Schreier we hear fine playing but fairly monotonous, singsong rhythms. Schreier restrains it to the point of its being more-or-less humdrum. The concluding Allegro and Minuet come off well, the dances displaying a sweet lilt, but even here the lack of imaginative variety gets a bit wearisome.
Concerto No. 2 is one of the most popular in the set, highlighting the oboe, recorder, violin, and trumpet, the latter getting the bulk of the playing time. It is also among the most vivacious of the six concertos, but Schreier takes it at such a quick pace, with the trumpet so brightly lit, it's kind of abrasive, actually. Although the slow center section works well enough, Schreier continues his brisk tempos in the final movement, almost ruining what went before.
Listeners may enjoy Concerto No. 3 as well as they like No. 2, maybe more so. Here, Schreier and his players show a good deal of spirit, and the conductor sounds as though he's having a little more fun, at least in the first movement. By the time he gets to the concluding Allegro, however, it's off to the races again, with speeds that seem out of character with those of the other two movements. The piece loses subtlety and nuance as it goes along.
Concerto No. 4 is probably the most playful, with the soloists darting in and out of the structure, and Schreier and his ensemble make the most of it. This delightful little concerto sounds splendid under Schreier's direction, with every note and phrase oozing charm. I'm not sure why Schreier was so inconsistent about how he wanted these things done, but here he seems spot on.
In Concerto No. 5 the harpsichord and flute are the stars, with the violin adding a felicitous touch. Again, the tempos seem more routine than necessary, although they don't detract too much from Bach's intentions.
Even though Concerto No. 6 is for me the least-distinctive work of the set and uses the smallest group of players, it doesn't usually feel small. Despite a shaky opening movement, it is one of Schreier's more successful performances, with only the slightly weighty sonics tending slightly to distract from the intimacy of the music.
The set places Concertos 1, 3, and 6 on the first disc, these being the pieces that establish dialogues between instrumental choirs answering one another. On disc two we get Concertos 2, 4, and 5, which highlight more solo playing. Fair enough.
In addition to the six Brandenburg Concertos we get the two triple concertos (BWV 1064 for three violins, strings, and continuo and BWV 1044 for harpsichord, violin, and flute). They appear a touch more open and extended than the Brandenburgs, giving the interpretations more life. As before, the players perform well, with 1044 coming off best.
The sound, which Philips recorded in April and September of 1992, is distinctly warm and just a tad heavy. The instruments are well spread out across the stage but with only moderate depth among them. While the recording doesn't offer the very best definition, it is smooth and easily listenable. I would have liked a little more sparkle, although I have no serious complaints.
Given the wide variety of fine Brandenburg recordings available, it seems to me a person can find one or more to fit almost every taste. My own favorites include those by Trevor Pinnock and the European Brandenburg Ensemble (Avie) and the English Concert (DG Archiv), Neville Marriner and the Academy of St. Martin-in-the-Fields (Philips), Gustav Leonhardt and his Ensemble (Sony), Christopher Hogwood and the Academy of Ancient Music (L'Oiseau-Lyre), Raymond Leppard and the English Chamber Orchestra (Philips), Jordi Savall and Les Concert des Nations (Astree), and others. There are more than enough to choose from unless one is an avid collector and simply has to own every recording possible.
John J. Puccio, Editor, Publisher, Reviewer
Understand, I'm just an everyday guy reacting to something I love. And I've been doing it for a very long time, my appreciation for classical music starting with the musical excerpts on The Big John and Sparkie radio show in the early Fifties and the purchase of my first recording, The 101 Strings Play the Classics, around 1956. In the late Sixties I began teaching high school English and Film Studies as well as becoming interested in hi-fi, my audio ambitions graduating me from a pair of AR-3 speakers to the Fulton J's recommended by The Stereophile's J. Gordon Holt. In the early Seventies, I began writing for a number of audio magazines, including Audio Excellence, Audio Forum, The Boston Audio Society Speaker, The American Record Guide, and from 1976 until 2008, The $ensible Sound, for which I served as Classical Music Editor.
Today, I'm retired from teaching and use a pair of bi-amped VMPS RM40s loudspeakers for my listening. In addition to writing the Classical Candor blog, I served as the Movie Review Editor for the Web site Movie Metropolis (formerly DVDTown) from 1997-2013. Music and movies. Life couldn't be better.
Karl W. Nehring, Contributing Reviewer
For more than 20 years I was the editor ofThe $ensible Soundmagazine and a regular contributor to its classical review pages. I would not presume to present myself as some sort of expert on music, but I have a deep love for and appreciation of many types of music, "classical" especially, and have listened to thousands of recordings over the years, many of which still line the walls of my listening room (and occasionally spill onto the furniture and floor, much to the chagrin of my long-suffering wife). I have always taken the approach as a reviewer that what I am trying to do is simply to point out to readers that I have come across a recording that I have found of interest, a recording that I think they might appreciate my having pointed out to them. I suppose that sounds a bit simple-minded, but I know I appreciate reading reviews by others that do the same for me -- point out recordings that I think I might enjoy.
For readers who might be wondering about what kind of system I am using to do my listening, I should probably point out that I do a LOT of music listening and employ a variety of means to do so in a variety of environments, as I would imagine many music lovers also do. Starting at the more grandiose end of the scale, the system in which I do my most serious listening comprises an Onkyo C-7030 CD player, Legacy Audio StreamLine preamplifier, Legacy Audio PowerBloc2 amplifier, and a pair of Legacy Audio Focus SE speakers augmented by a Legacy Point One subwoofer. I also do a lot of listening while driving in my 2016 Acura RDX with its nice-sounding ELS Studio sound system through which I play CDs (the ones I especially like I rip to the Acura's hard drive so that I can listen to them whenever I want) or stream music through the system using my LG G7 ThinQ cell phone, which features surprisingly sophisticated audio circuitry. For more casual listening at home when I am not in my listening room, I often stream music through the phone into a Vizio soundbar system that has remarkably nice sound for such a diminutive physical presence. And finally, at the least grandiose end of the scale, I have an Ultimate Ears Wonderboom Bluetooth speaker for those occasions where I am somewhere by myself without a sound system but in desperate need of a musical fix. I just can't imagine life without music and I am humbly grateful for the technology that enables us to enjoy it in so many wonderful ways.
Bryan Geyer, Technical Analyst
I initially embraced classical music in 1954 when I mistuned my car radio and heard the Heifetz recording of Mendelssohn's Violin Concerto. That inspired me to board the new "hi-fi" DIY bandwagon. In 1957 I joined one of the pioneer semiconductor makers and spent the next 32 years marketing transistors and microcircuits to military contractors. Home audio DIY projects remained a personal passion until 1989 when we created our own new photography equipment company. I later (2012) revived my interest in two channel audio when we "downsized" our life and determined that mini-monitors + paired subwoofers were a great way to mate fine music with the space constraints of condo living.
Visitors that view my technical papers on this site may wonder why they appear here, rather than on a site that features audio equipment reviews. My reason is that I tried the latter, and prefer to publish for people who actually want to listen to music; not to equipment. My focus is in describing what's technically beneficial to assure that the sound of the system will accurately replicate the source input signal (i. e. exhibit high accuracy) without inordinate cost and complexity. Conversely, most of the audiophiles of today strive to achieve sound that's euphonic, i.e. be personally satisfying. In essence, audiophiles seek sound that's consistent with their desire; the music is simply a test signal.
It is the goal of Classical Candor to promote the enjoyment of classical music. Other forms of music come and go--minuets, waltzes, ragtime, blues, jazz, bebop, country-western, rock-'n'-roll, heavy metal, rap, and the rest--but classical music has been around for hundreds of years and will continue to be around for hundreds more. It's no accident that every major city in the world has one or more symphony orchestras.
When I was young, I heard it said that only intellectuals could appreciate classical music, that it required dedicated concentration to appreciate. Nonsense. I'm no intellectual, and I've always loved classical music. Anyone who's ever seen and enjoyed Disney's Fantasia or a Looney Tunes cartoon playing Rossini's William Tell Overture or Liszt's Hungarian Rhapsody No. 2 can attest to the power and joy of classical music, and that's just about everybody.
So, if Classical Candor can expand one's awareness of classical music and bring more joy to one's life, more power to it. It's done its job. --John J. Puccio
Readers with polite, courteous, helpful letters may send them to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Readers with impolite, discourteous, bitchy, whining, complaining, nasty, mean-spirited, unhelpful letters may send them to email@example.com.