It wasn't long ago that I wrote in the $ensible Sound magazine, "Was there ever a grander grand opera than Verdi's Aida, and have there ever been any grander recordings of it than Karajan's two stereo performances on Decca and EMI? Coincidentally, both Decca and EMI chose to reissue their recordings at about the same time, in 2007, and while the earlier Decca interpretation may in some ways be the grander of the two, it's the later, 1979 EMI recording that has the slight sonic advantage."Some people may wish to argue the point. The Decca is very fine, and it has a marginally better cast, the knock against the EMI version being that Jose Carreras didn't have a big enough voice for the part of Radames, even though it's hard to make that statement after listening to it.
Anyway, I had fully intended to listen straight through this 1959 Decca recording, but it wasn't ten minutes in that I could not resist putting on the '79 EMI recording for comparison. From that point on, I would play a section of one, pause, and then play the same section on the other disc. I had never actually done this before, and the results were enlightening.
For one thing, I hadn't remembered how slowly and deliberately Karajan conducted the earlier Decca performance. While the singers are splendid and the chorus is even more intelligible than on the later EMI recording, Karajan's odd, calculated tempos and sometimes hesitant direction tend to stand out. Twenty years on, he had lightened up, and the EMI reading sounds more spontaneous.
Interestingly, it's also good they could fit the opera onto two discs rather than three.
Sonically, there is much to like about the Decca recording. The audio engineers remastered it on this "Originals" set from the 96kHz/24-bit Super Digital mastering the company did in 1999 for their "Legends" series. It is clean and taut, with noise reduction making it almost as quiet as the EMI set. What you get with the EMI, sonically, is a little more air, more ambience, more bloom, more impact, and more bass. But for that matter, the Decca produces an enormous dynamic range.
So, I'll still take the EMI recording overall, although I wish they had remastered it using their Abbey Road Technology and released it in their "Great Recordings of the Century" series instead of just reusing their old 1986 digital master. Oh, well....
Adapted from a review the author originally published in the $ensible Sound magazine.
JJP
Interesting -- this is the only version I've ever owned on CD, and I was always under the impression that it was note-complete. Listening to II.ii now, I realize that it has exactly the same amount of music before the triumphal march as the Price/Domingo/Leinsdorf version I used to have on LP (the first opera recording I ever owned, purchased when I was 15). What am I missing?
ReplyDeleteJames, I'm afraid I cannot locate my own source for the information mentioned. I adapted the current review from a very old LP review I wrote for the $ensible Sound magazine long ago. I no longer have the LP set, but I can only figure I must have found (or misunderstood) the info in the LP notes. In any case, thanks for the heads up, and I have amended the review.
ReplyDelete