May 6, 2025

Weinberg String Quartets Nos. 3, 9, and 14 (CD Review)

by Ryan Ross

String Quartet No. 3 in D Minor, Op. 14Improvisation and Romance for String QuartetString Quartet No. 9 in F-Sharp Minor, Op. 80String Quartet No. 14, Op. 122. Arcadia Quartet. Chandos CHAN 20328

 

I have long considered Mieczyslaw Weinberg to be a hit-and-miss composer. But I must say: the more of his music I get to know, the more the misses outpace the hits. Now, not everything I would call a “miss” is necessarily bad; some stuff is even mildly engaging while I listen to it. But little attains much memorability. Most releases in this Chandos string quartet series tell the tale in microcosm: an arresting movement here and there (or an entire work if you’re lucky) alongside vast stretches of miss. The Fifth Volume comes in a bit below this average: lots of okay (or worse) surrounding small islands of special.

We’ll start with what I consider to be the most compelling item: the Improvisation and Romance for String Quartet. David Fanning’s liner notes explain that this work is in a “comprehensible,” “anti-formalist” style favored by Soviet authorities during the Stalin era. I’ll be honest: I abhor the Soviet government’s censorship methods, but I like it when Weinberg composed in this style, to which his Third Symphony (an absolutely wonderful piece) also belongs. When his tendency toward doodling took a back seat to directness, he was at his best. And so it goes in this pair of miniatures. The Improvisation is the less memorable of the two but still pleasant and easy to follow. However, the Romance is the gem of the whole disc – sporting a beautifully wistful melody that shows what Weinberg could do when he felt like it.

 

Sometimes Weinberg successfully balanced being clever with being direct, as he did in the Fourth and Sixth Quartets. The Third Quartet of 1944 is very much in this vein, if somewhat less inspired. It begins with one of his signature “driving-rhythm” movements, this being one with clear thematic ideas and a satisfying formal trajectory. The second movement is about the same length, similarly well crafted, and full of feeling. The trouble here is that for all the sincerity of expression, there is not a truly memorable moment to take with you after the music stops playing. The third movement almost solves this problem with its mysterious opening theme, but the rest never lives up to that initial promise. And the theme itself kind of fizzles by the end. It’s all respectable, but you’re left wanting more.

With the Ninth Quartet of 1963 we get closer to Weinberg’s late style, of which I am mostly not a fan. But while this work still doesn’t descend quite to the dreariness of the last quartets, it’s hardly distinguished. We have another driving opening movement with quick repeated motives and decent drama. The delicate scherzo that follows is likewise a solid listening experience with some simple ideas that shine through the gloom. Next is a 10-minute Andante – a finely-wrought slow movement that I struggle to describe in further useful terms. A rather nondescript Allegro moderato closes things out. Truthfully, I am listening to the music as I write this paragraph because I have trouble remembering much when it’s not directly in my ears. It more or less holds the attention. But beyond that? There’s nothing here I’m champing at the bit to revisit soon.

I don’t actually have much to say about the Fourteenth Quartet that I haven’t already said about the Thirteenth, Fifteenth, and Sixteenth Quartets in other reviews here. Think second-rate late Shostakovich. If that sounds like your idea of a good time, dive right in. Anyone else who reads this should carefully consider how they want to spend its 25 or so minutes.

Maybe I’m complaining too much. To be sure, I’d gladly take every work on this disc (Fourteenth Quartet included) over anything by Weinberg’s younger contemporaries Schnittke and Gubaidulina. So I guess my definition of “miss” is highly variable after all. And my mild displeasure (as it turns out) has absolutely nothing to do with the excellent performances given here by the Arcadia Quartet. The liner notes make clear that its members really believe in this music. Well, I’m glad for them. If you’re going to perform and record something, you might as well do so with conviction. I’m just not sure that those of us who aren’t Weinberg-o-holics will be able to muster comparable enthusiasm.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for your comment. It will be published after review.

Meet the Staff

Meet the Staff
John J. Puccio, Founder and Contributor

Understand, I'm just an everyday guy reacting to something I love. And I've been doing it for a very long time, my appreciation for classical music starting with the musical excerpts on the Big Jon and Sparkie radio show in the early Fifties and the purchase of my first recording, The 101 Strings Play the Classics, around 1956. In the late Sixties I began teaching high school English and Film Studies as well as becoming interested in hi-fi, my audio ambitions graduating me from a pair of AR-3 speakers to the Fulton J's recommended by The Stereophile's J. Gordon Holt. In the early Seventies, I began writing for a number of audio magazines, including Audio Excellence, Audio Forum, The Boston Audio Society Speaker, The American Record Guide, and from 1976 until 2008, The $ensible Sound, for which I served as Classical Music Editor.

Today, I'm retired from teaching and use a pair of bi-amped VMPS RM40s loudspeakers for my listening. In addition to writing for the Classical Candor blog, I served as the Movie Review Editor for the Web site Movie Metropolis (formerly DVDTown) from 1997-2013. Music and movies. Life couldn't be better.

Karl Nehring, Editor and Contributor

For nearly 30 years I was the editor of The $ensible Sound magazine and a regular contributor to both its equipment and recordings review pages. I would not presume to present myself as some sort of expert on music, but I have a deep love for and appreciation of many types of music, "classical" especially, and have listened to thousands of recordings over the years, many of which still line the walls of my listening room (and occasionally spill onto the furniture and floor, much to the chagrin of my long-suffering wife). I have always taken the approach as a reviewer that what I am trying to do is simply to point out to readers that I have come across a recording that I have found of interest, a recording that I think they might appreciate my having pointed out to them. I suppose that sounds a bit simple-minded, but I know I appreciate reading reviews by others that do the same for me — point out recordings that they think I might enjoy.

For readers who might be wondering about what kind of system I am using to do my listening, I should probably point out that I do a LOT of music listening and employ a variety of means to do so in a variety of environments, as I would imagine many music lovers also do. Starting at the more grandiose end of the scale, the system in which I do my most serious listening comprises Marantz CD 6007 and Onkyo CD 7030 CD players, NAD C 658 streaming preamp/DAC, Legacy Audio PowerBloc2 amplifier, and a pair of Legacy Audio Focus SE loudspeakers. I occasionally do some listening through pair of Sennheiser 560S headphones. I miss the excellent ELS Studio sound system in our 2016 Acura RDX (now my wife's daily driver) on which I had ripped more than a hundred favorite CDs to the hard drive, so now when driving my 2024 Honda CRV Sport L Hybrid, I stream music from my phone through its adequate but hardly outstanding factory system. For more casual listening at home when I am not in my listening room, I often stream music through a Roku Streambar Pro system (soundbar plus four surround speakers and a 10" sealed subwoofer) that has surprisingly nice sound for such a diminutive physical presence and reasonable price. Finally, at the least grandiose end of the scale, I have an Ultimate Ears Wonderboom II Bluetooth speaker and a pair of Google Pro Earbuds for those occasions where I am somewhere by myself without a sound system but in desperate need of a musical fix. I just can’t imagine life without music and I am humbly grateful for the technologies that enable us to enjoy it in so many wonderful ways.

William (Bill) Heck, Webmaster and Contributor

Among my early childhood memories are those of listening to my mother playing records (some even 78 rpm ones!) of both classical music and jazz tunes. I suppose that her love of music was transmitted genetically, and my interest was sustained by years of playing in rock bands – until I realized that this was no way to make a living. The interest in classical music was rekindled in grad school when the university FM station serving as background music for studying happened to play the Brahms First Symphony. As the work came to an end, it struck me forcibly that this was the most beautiful thing I had ever heard, and from that point on, I never looked back. This revelation was to the detriment of my studies, as I subsequently spent way too much time simply listening, but music has remained a significant part of my life. These days, although I still can tell a trumpet from a bassoon and a quarter note from a treble clef, I have to admit that I remain a nonexpert. But I do love music in general and classical music in particular, and I enjoy sharing both information and opinions about it.

The audiophile bug bit about the same time that I returned to classical music. I’ve gone through plenty of equipment, brands from Audio Research to Yamaha, and the best of it has opened new audio insights. Along the way, I reviewed components, and occasionally recordings, for The $ensible Sound magazine. Most recently I’ve moved to my “ultimate system” consisting of a BlueSound Node streamer, an ancient Toshiba multi-format disk player serving as a CD transport, Legacy Wavelet II DAC/preamp/crossover, dual Legacy PowerBloc2 amps, and Legacy Signature SE speakers (biamped), all connected with decently made, no-frills cables. With the arrival of CD and higher resolution streaming, that is now the source for most of my listening.

Ryan Ross, Contributor

I started listening to and studying classical music in earnest nearly three decades ago. This interest grew naturally out of my training as a pianist. I am now a musicologist by profession, specializing in British and other symphonic music of the 19th and 20th centuries. My scholarly work has been published in major music journals, as well as in other outlets. Current research focuses include twentieth-century symphonic historiography, and the music of Jean Sibelius, Ralph Vaughan Williams, and Malcolm Arnold.

I am honored to contribute writings to Classical Candor. In an age where the classical recording industry is being subjected to such profound pressures and changes, it is more important than ever for those of us steeped in this cultural tradition to continue to foster its love and exposure. I hope that my readers can find value, no matter how modest, in what I offer here.


Bryan Geyer, Technical Analyst

I initially embraced classical music in 1954 when I mistuned my car radio and heard the Heifetz recording of Mendelssohn's Violin Concerto. That inspired me to board the new "hi-fi" DIY bandwagon. In 1957 I joined one of the pioneer semiconductor makers and spent the next 32 years marketing transistors and microcircuits to military contractors. Home audio DIY projects remained a personal passion until 1989 when we created our own new photography equipment company. I later (2012) revived my interest in two channel audio when we "downsized" our life and determined that mini-monitors + paired subwoofers were a great way to mate fine music with the space constraints of condo living.

Visitors that view my technical papers on this site may wonder why they appear here, rather than on a site that features audio equipment reviews. My reason is that I tried the latter, and prefer to publish for people who actually want to listen to music; not to equipment. My focus is in describing what's technically beneficial to assure that the sound of the system will accurately replicate the source input signal (i. e. exhibit high accuracy) without inordinate cost and complexity. Conversely, most of the audiophiles of today strive to achieve sound that's euphonic, i.e. be personally satisfying. In essence, audiophiles seek sound that's consistent with their desire; the music is simply a test signal.

Mission Statement

It is the goal of Classical Candor to promote the enjoyment of classical music. Other forms of music come and go--minuets, waltzes, ragtime, blues, jazz, bebop, country-western, rock-'n'-roll, heavy metal, rap, and the rest--but classical music has been around for hundreds of years and will continue to be around for hundreds more. It's no accident that every major city in the world has one or more symphony orchestras.

When I was young, I heard it said that only intellectuals could appreciate classical music, that it required dedicated concentration to appreciate. Nonsense. I'm no intellectual, and I've always loved classical music. Anyone who's ever seen and enjoyed Disney's Fantasia or a Looney Tunes cartoon playing Rossini's William Tell Overture or Liszt's Hungarian Rhapsody No. 2 can attest to the power and joy of classical music, and that's just about everybody.

So, if Classical Candor can expand one's awareness of classical music and bring more joy to one's life, more power to it. It's done its job. --John J. Puccio

Contact Information

Readers with polite, courteous, helpful letters may send them to classicalcandor@gmail.com

Readers with impolite, discourteous, bitchy, whining, complaining, nasty, mean-spirited, unhelpful letters may send them to classicalcandor@recycle.bin.

"Their Master's Voice" by Michael Sowa

"Their Master's Voice" by Michael Sowa