By Bryan Geyer
Two of the most notable absurdities in home audio share a common fault: They’re grossly oversized and/or overweight for any normally dimensioned residential living room. You’d really have to live in Hearst Castle in order to claim that the use of these components is sensible or appropriate. I’m talking about (a) those monster (100 pounds apiece) power amplifiers that cost $5k-$10k ea., and (b) those towering pairs of planar electrostatic loudspeakers that cost a bundle—despite their poor efficiency, inconsistent performance (always subject to numerous ambient variables), and comparatively (to dynamic/magnetic drivers) crummy reliability.
It’s very likely that
the era of the 100 pound power amplifiers is now ending, and that all such boat
anchors will eventually become obscure relics. Future hi-end speaker systems
just won’t be built that way. The old concept wherein one big power amplifier
is used to feed a passive crossover network that’s in series with all drivers
is truly archaic. The modern trend is to use active line-level crossovers that
feed multiple power amplifiers. Those bandpass amplifiers can then directly
drive the separate segments of a multi-driver speaker system, and do so
with precise accuracy, better damping, and fully independent gain control. This
method presents vital convenience and flexibility advantages, since each
amplifier’s response can then be optimized as needed to assist in attaining a
desired room response (EQ) profile. The use of one big power amplifier/channel
was a natural and practical solution that fit the past, but new size and
integration breakthroughs have now made it preferable to consider this
multi-amplifier alternative. Top quality hi-end systems will embrace this
concept. In many cases, it’s likely that some of these bandpass power
amplifiers will be fully integrated with their designated driver, and buried
inside the speaker enclosure. In those instances, compact class D power
amplifiers will become the preferred tool, just as with the self-powered
subwoofers that are so popular today.
Big planar panel
electrostatic loudspeakers (see photo) will soon become extinct unless there’s
substantial design improvement. In general, the existing electrostatic means
for implementing planar propagation is just too “buggy” to sustain consistent,
reliable performance. Such speakers are sensitive to variations in ambient
temperature, humidity, and altitude (moon phase too?). They’re easily damaged, inefficient, and
vulnerable when pushed to sustain high sound pressure levels. They’re also
costly to make, ship, and sell. Robust redesign seems essential. It’s possible
that new materials (such as graphene) might spur this progression. Regardless,
dynamic/magnetic loudspeaker design has steadily evolved, and the focused
propagation advantage that’s attributed to planar speakers seems less
distinctive now than in prior decades. Barring a dramatic upgrade, I see a dim
future for those big electrostatic panels that resemble room divider screens;
they’re looking obsolescent. That said, the large planar model 10e ESL from
Sanders Sound Systems looks exceptional. It’s an elegant “no compromise”
product (price with designated Magtech Stereo amp ~ $22.5k) that’s aimed to
satisfy the pride of its creator and the respect of the ultra-niche market that
it serves. This looks to be a fine example at what’s possible when good
engineering meets a targeted (lots of listening space + gobs of money)
consumer. That’s a convergence that I’ve never experienced, but maybe it fits
your profile.
And On Listening Trials…
If you want to
conduct a listening trial face-off between your regular power amplifier and
another amp that’s on loan from a friend or dealer, do make certain that you
compare the two amplifiers fairly, under identical test conditions. Of course,
that means using the same cable connections, same loudspeakers, same room
setup, and the same listening seat, but don’t automatically
use the same position on your master volume attenuator. Be aware that the
internal voltage gain of various power amplifiers will routinely vary by
design; they commonly range between ~ +23dB and +29dB. You can research
differences in gain by checking the respective amplifiers’ specifications; they’re
generally printed on the last page of the related instruction booklet, as well
as appearing on makers’ websites. One can easily compensate for a gain
difference by adjusting the main volume attenuator to assure that the sound
pressure level (SPL) at the listening position is precisely equal for all
amplifiers under test.* The incoming source signal’s amplitude range is
normally sufficient to accommodate any adjustment of the attenuator that might
be needed to set an accurate SPL match at any desired listening level.
To accurately monitor
the SPL matching, use a basic SPL meter (https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1149079-REG/nady_dsm_1x_digital_spl_meter.html),
and position it (mounted on a tripod, or on a lighting or microphone stand) at
the listening site. Use a fixed frequency sine wave source as the test signal;
something between ~ 400 Hz and ~ 800 Hz is generally best. Match carefully! A
difference of as little as ± 0.5 dB in SPL could unfairly bias your judgment,
and the loudest output will always win, regardless of any other aural
distinction that might seem evident.
Given modern
solid-state power amplifier design, and assuming that such amplifiers are not
driven into clipping, and that their sound pressure levels are accurately
matched, you will probably conclude that there’s zero audible difference
between the contending products. This expectation does not apply if the on-loan
amplifier is an appealing new component that you’ve recently considered buying.
In that instance, the on-loan amplifier will always sound spectacularly
superior; it will “blow away” the old amp.
BG (September 2019)
*If your master
stereo volume attenuator has calibrated stepped detents you might find
it difficult to achieve a setting that yields a precise SPL match. In that
event, check the rear panel of both power amplifiers. Many amps include a pair
of rotary potentiometers, installed at the input stage, to facilitate balance
adjustment of the incoming left/right stereo source signals. You can use these
pots as supplementary volume controls to trim the SPL output in small
increments that are finer than a stepped attenuator might resolve. Just
remember to return these pots to their previous positions (generally full up)
when your testing trial is finished.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comment. It will be published after review.