Andre Previn, London Symphony Orchestra. EMI 50999 9 67689 2 1 (2-disc
set).
Russian composer Peter Tchaikovsky (1840-1893) wrote the
second of his big ballets, The Sleeping
Beauty, in 1889 and premiered it in 1890. Unfortunately for the composer,
while the ballet would go on to become one of his most-loved items, he wouldn’t
live long enough to see it attain its ultimate popularity. It seems a shame,
given how much self-doubt Tchaikovsky always had and with what little regard he
held most of his own work. The Sleeping
Beauty also enjoys the distinction of being the longest piece of music
Tchaikovsky composed, usually abbreviated as it is here. (EMI’s packaging
assures us it is “complete,” but they cut it by several minutes.)
Anyway, when Angel Records (EMI’s subsidiary classical
label in America at the time) first released this 1974 recording on LP, it was
both a blessing and a chore. The blessing: When Previn recorded it, it went
immediately to the top of my recommendations for the work (on vinyl).
Subsequently, I noticed its appearance on other lists as a top contender,
including High Fidelity magazine's
"Record Riches of a Quarter-Century," Gramophone magazine's "Recommended Recordings," the Penguin Guide’s recommended listings, etc. The “chore” I’ll come to.
Tchaikovsky’s music is a nonstop flow of inspired
melodies, both graceful and dramatic. Previn’s performance is at once exciting,
subtle, enchanting, and lovely. Unlike many other, higher powered productions,
Previn's reading brings a true fairy-tale richness and delicacy to the score.
But that chore: The sound on the American-issued LP seemed
a little dull and constricted, and the recording took many years finally to
show up on CD. When it did appear on silver disc, the company packaged it in a
hard cardboard long-box, with a plastic tray insert that held two separate
jewel cases and a lavishly illustrated, twelve-inch story booklet, obviously
meant for children. The box itself, clearly intended as a gift set, would not
even fit on an ordinary CD shelf.
Happily, EMI rectified the former sins of their Angel
subsidiary and the initial goofy CD packaging by issuing the complete Previn Sleeping Beauty in 2004 in a two-disc,
slimline jewel box with proper notes and a budget price. And the EMI sound,
like almost all of producer Christopher Bishop and engineer Christopher
Parker's collaborations, is first-rate. In 2009 they re-released it in the pictured box at an even better price. The combination is unbeatable.
What’s more, although the new packaging indicates that the
mastering is the same one they had done a decade earlier (“Digital remastering
1993 by EMI Records Ltd.”), it sounds to me somewhat different. The newer
version seems very slightly brighter, cleaner, clearer, and more open by
comparison to the older mastering. I
can only account for this in one of two ways: Either (1) EMI touched up the new
mastering without telling anybody; or (2) I was hearing the differences among
my three CD players (two Sony’s and a Yamaha), even though I kept changing out
the discs every few minutes. Whatever, the set is still the best recommendation
I can make for this piece, and EMI offer it at a price that’s still unbeatable.
To listen to a brief excerpt from this album, click here:
JJP
John, the difference you hear between the releases is real. This 2009 is the best of all available domestic releases (I have not heard any of the Japanese). It is also better than the one in the recent box set. Sadly, all of the ballets in the box suffer from knob twiddling. The highs are rolled off, probably to mask the tape hiss. I'll take the cuts in the 2009 for the better sound. By the way, the editions of The Nutcracker and Swan Lake from around the same time (black background photos) are also the best sounding. Seems EMI label or Warner are identical. Enjoy!
ReplyDeleteJohn, I never warmed much for Previn's readings of the Tchaikovsky ballets. This Sleeping Beauty here is, well yeah, OK, nothing really bad but nothing much is going on either. It's all rather tame and safe without any particular insights, passion or magic. The sonics aren't much to write home about either. Very studio-like without any bloom to the orchestral sections. The hi-res remastering may be more open than the earlier tin-can cd version but still no great shakes. Performance-wise I would still go for Ansermet and Dorati (both versions), or even Fistoulari and Monteux in reduced readings. They all share what Previn lacks: a sense of the theatre.
ReplyDeleteMarc