When EMI first released Andre Previn's recording of The Planets on LP back in
1973, it became an instant favorite of mine. Not only did I find the
performance as good or better than anyone else’s, I thought the sound was of
reference quality. As of this writing it’s around forty years later, and my
opinion hasn’t changed. I still use the “Uranus” movement as an audio standard
for judging other recordings and stereo equipment. I first owned the English
EMI LP pressing, vastly preferring it to the American Angel pressing; then
there was the EMI compact disc, which wasn’t quite as open or solid as the LP;
and later the EMI Japan mastering, which improved upon the English product.
Now, Hi-Q Records have made a good thing even better in an XRCD24/K2 audiophile
remastering of distinction.
Let’s start, though, with the music. English composer
Gustav Holst (1874-1934) began writing his most-famous piece of music, the
seven-movement orchestral suite The
Planets, during the years of “The Great War,” premiering it in 1918. That
might explain why the first couple of segments are about “War” and “Peace.” He
titled each movement after the astrological sign of a known planet at the time
(not counting Earth), although the music doesn’t really describe zodiac signs
or planets so much as it expresses feelings about the various moods of the
human spirit. It was Sir Adrian Boult who conducted the first performance of
the work and recorded it regularly thereafter. His final disc for EMI in 1979
remains one of my favorites; however, I still prefer this Previn recording to
his.
The music begins with the theme of war in “Mars, the
Bringer of War.” Under Previn, there’s a strong, menacing forward momentum,
without the music sounding raucous or unyielding. Previn’s reading is warlike,
to be sure, yet lyrical in its rhythmic beat.
In the second movement, “Venus, the Bringer of Peace,”
Previn and the LSO handle the lovely adagio delicately, with a rising passion
and Romanticism as goes along. The movement--tranquil and serene--provides a
relief from the rigors of war that precede it. We also hear echoes in it of
Vaughan Williams’s “The Lark Ascending,” written a few years earlier, and
Previn was always a subtle and effective interpreter of Vaughan Williams.
“Mercury, the Winged Messenger” is a light-footed scherzo,
which supplies a little excitement after the relative calm of “Venus.” Previn
seems to delight in it, making it playful and fun.
“Jupiter, the Bringer of Jollity” comes next, and it’s a
natural successor to Mercury, being a big, jovial bacchanal. While Previn
ensures it is properly festive and stately, he never lets the music become so
rambunctious that it overstays its welcome.
“Saturn, the Bringer of Old Age” was Holst’s personal
favorite segment of the suite, and Previn gives it appropriate weight. Why
Holst liked it so much I’m not sure; I find it the least interesting part of
the work. Nevertheless, Previn and the LSO play it as persuasively as anyone.
After that comes “Uranus, the Magician,” the section of
the disc I often use as a demo piece for friends. It has everything an
audiophile loves, from deep bass to highest treble, from the softest notes to
the loudest fortes; it exhibits a full demonstration of an orchestra’s
capabilities. What’s more, Previn’s interpretation is appropriately magical and
not a little spooky.
The suite ends with “Neptune, the Mystic,” with a wordless
female chorus (the Ambrosian Singers) fading off into silence at the end.
Previn’s reading is sweet and gentle and not at all sentimental as the piece
concludes in the most-distant reaches of space.
Producer Christopher Bishop and engineer Christopher
Parker recorded The Planets for EMI
at Kingsway Hall, London, in 1973. My job was to compare the sound of this 2012
remastered Hi-Q compact disc with the best previous CD I could find, the 2005
remastered EMI-Japan edition, carefully listening, comparing, and switching out
the discs between two CD players on occasion.
Hi-Q remastered the sound using JVC’s XRCD24/K2 technology
at JVC’s Mastering Center in Japan. I’ve explained the XRCD process before, so
let me just remind you it is probably the most-precise, most-advanced method
currently available of transferring material from a master tape to disc, and
the results we find on the Hi-Q disc are extraordinarily good.
The Hi-Q sound exhibits excellent depth, air, space,
dynamic range, and impact. Compared to the EMI-Japan disc, it displays slightly
better transient attack, impact, and cutoff, with a degree better detail and a
smoother, tauter, more cleanly and solidly defined body. The miking distance
makes the orchestra seem a touch constricted left to right for a seat a bit
farther back in the hall than one often hears in extremely close-up recordings.
The sonics are also a touch dry at times yet still lightly resonant, with just
enough warmth to add to the realism. There was no doubt in my mind about the
superiority of the Hi-Q disc’s clarity and punch, its sparkling highs, its deep
bass, and its overall transparency.
As always, the folks at Hi-Q provide a premium product
with a premium package, a glossy, hard cardboard and plastic Digipak-type
container, the booklet notes sewn book-like into the center, the disc fastened
to the inside back cover.
To hear a brief excerpt from this album, click here:
JJP
John: Just looked this up on Amazon and saw it listed for $49.20. Ouch! -KWN
ReplyDeleteNot cheap, that's for sure. However, for a better price, you could also try Elusive Disc: http://www.elusivedisc.com/HOLST-THE-PLANETS-XRCD24/productinfo/HIQSXR03/
ReplyDeleteI have no idea why Amazon has it listed so high.
Thanks for both the review and the suggestion regarding Elusive Disc. I have several recordings of "The Planets". This reissue was the first CD I played with a CD player, pre-amp, and headphone amp I installed in my bedroom on my birthday. I was not prepared for the improvement in either the performance or the sound quality. Your reviews and those of Robert Levine have transformed the way I buy recorded music.
ReplyDeleteI have a very good headphone amp (cary xciter tube amp) and some very good headphones (ps1000 and hd800)- is it worth getting this (I read another review that basically said- referring to speakers I would assume - that unless you've got great subwoofer capability, don't bother with the xrcd24) ...
ReplyDeleteI've never heard the recording through headphones of any kind, so I couldn't say. Certainly, good system bass is helpful, but the recording is also quite transparent in the midrange, a little more so than EMI's regular issue. Perhaps, though, because of the price, if you haven't heard the recording before, you might find the regular EMI release a more reasonable choice.
ReplyDelete