J.S. Bach wrote quite a lot of music for the orchestra,
but most of it was in the way of concertos. Interestingly, his four Orchestral
Suites, French-influenced Baroque forms much favored in his day, also
include extensive parts for solo instruments with ensemble backup. Certainly,
we’ve had enough recordings of the Orchestral
Suites, but this one from 1990 with Robert Haydon Clark leading the Consort
of London is welcome just the same.
Nobody knows exactly when Bach wrote these Suites. Even though they have catalogue
numbers of BWV1066-1069, it doesn’t mean much since the numbering system isn’t
necessarily chronological but by genre. However, some recent researchers
believe that Bach may have written the Suites
during the years 1716-1723, later revising them between 1725 and 1739 in the
arrangements we know today. What’s more, Bach didn’t even want to call them
“suites,” although they are sets of five to seven movements each; he called them
“overtures,” a custom of the day in referring to a complete set by its first
movement only. Anyway, when he wrote them and what he called them are beside
the point; the main thing is that they continue to entertain us with their wit
and charm.
From what little I can gather about the Consort of London,
they play on instruments made in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. To
be fair, though, the instruments don’t actually sound “period”; they appear
tuned to modern values, and they sound, for all intents and purposes, like
modern instruments. I dunno. The main thing is that the Consort play in a
lively fashion, and all four suites fit neatly onto a single disc.
The Consort’s playing sounds consistently stylish and
refined, and Clark leads them in generally well-judged tempi, never so fast
that they disfigure the music, yet never so slow that they ever feel sluggish.
More important, Clark maintains a hearty rhythmic pulse in every segment, with
pointed contrasts and a smooth flow.
If I had to criticize anything, it might be that from
movement to movement one doesn’t hear as much difference in pacing or emphasis
from Clark as one hears from some other conductors. In other words, in faster
movements Clark is sometimes a tad slower than we expect, while in slower
movements he’s a touch faster, creating a kind of sameness to each suite as a
whole.
But I quibble. Clark handles the dance tunes throughout
with an uncommon grace, the flute in No.
2 and the trumpet in No. 4
especially felicitous. Then there’s No. 3
with its familiar overture and famous “Air” that come off in regal, graceful
fashion. There’s simply not much to complain about here.
Among my own favorites in this music on modern instruments
are still the recordings of Sir Neville Marriner and the Academy of St. Martin
in the Fields (Decca-Argo) and Raymond Leppard and the English Chamber
Orchestra (Philips); and on period instruments Jordi Savall and Les Concert des
Nations (Astree), Ton Koopman and the Amsterdam Baroque Orchestra (DHM), Martin
Pearlman and the Boston Baroque Orchestra (Telarc), and Sigiswald Kuijken and
La Petite Bande (DHM). Although I don’t find Clark’s renditions of the music
quite fitting into this company, he would not be entirely out of place among
them, either.
Originally recorded by Phoenix Music UK at Henry Wood
Hall, London, and issued by Collins Classics in 1990, Brilliant Classics have
re-released it in 2012. The sound is reasonably rich and crisp. Even if it
hasn’t a lot of depth or air, it does provide a realistic orchestral spread,
with good balance amongst the instruments. There could be, perhaps, a bit more
heft in the upper and mid bass to offer greater weight and maybe a stronger
dynamic impact, but these are relatively minor concerns. Overall, there are few
if any Bach Overture recordings as
sonically satisfying as this one.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comment. It will be published after review.