Of Tchaikovsky’s six or seven symphonies (depending on how
you regard Manfred), Nos. 4-6 get
most of the attention, with No. 2
often the odd man out. In this newest cycle of Tchaikovsky symphonies from
Maestro Mikhail Pletnev, we get another of his well-ordered if somewhat
dispassionate readings of the works. Still, given the lyrical, song-filled
nature of the Second Symphony, there
is much to commend Pletnev’s rational approach.
Russian composer Peter Tchaikovsky (1840-1893) wrote his Symphony No. 2 in C minor, Op. 17, in
1872, premiered it in 1873, and revised it extensively about seven years later.
Critics and audiences liked it quite a lot, perhaps because of the abundance of
Russian folk music the composer included in it, much of it coming from the
Ukrainian region dubbed “Little Russia” and leading to the symphony’s nickname
as the “Little Russian.” It is generally a joyous, jubilant piece, its festive
nature undoubtedly contributing to its popularity.
By the time the opening movement reaches its second theme Allegro vivo, Pletnev has worked up a
suitably red-blooded passion, something much of his Tchaikovsky symphony cycle
for PentaTone has lacked. Then in the second movement we hear even more of the
Russian folk-inflected music for which fans know the work. The composer marked
it “quasi moderato,” and it is a kind of quasi march, beginning with march
rhythms and then alternating them with several songs.
In the Scherzo
Pletnev propels the music forward with particular vigor, although I still miss
some of the ardor I hear in conductors like Jansons (Chandos), Muti (EMI),
Abbado (DG), Haitink (Philips), even Pletnev himself in his earlier recording
for DG. Nevertheless, the interpretation tends to blend well with Pletnev’s
other well-reasoned Tchaikovsky readings for PentaTone.
It’s in the Finale
that Pletnev comes into his own; maybe he was saving it all up for the big
finish, just as Tchaikovsky did. In any case, there is a grandiloquent element
here that Pletnev catches well, with energy aplenty. The conductor lights it up
with a spark somewhat missing earlier.
As an accompanying piece, Pletnev plays Tchaikovsky’s
original first movement of the Second
Symphony. It is considerably longer and somewhat different in tone from the
version we usually hear. Tchaikovsky had said of the original work, “My God,
what a difficult, noisy, incoherent piece!” Perhaps so, but the original first
movement makes fascinating listening, with its more melancholic mood and
abundance of sometimes plaintive, sometimes rousing melodies. Tchaikovsky had
favored the lighter, more rhapsodic qualities of the revision, yet it’s no
wonder other critics of day preferred the composer’s first impressions.
Incidentally, for a recording of the complete original Symphony No. 2, the reader couldn’t do much better than hearing
Geoffrey Simon’s interpretation with the LSO on Chandos.
PentaTone recorded the symphony in multichannel at DZZ
Studio 5, Moscow, in 2011, and they released it here on a hybrid
stereo/multichannel SACD. In the stereo SACD layer to which I listened, the
sound was quite good, very robust, with strong dynamic contrasts, especially in
the Finale. Although it is isn’t the
most transparent sound you’ll find, it is fairly natural. The midrange has a
most lifelike quality about it; the bass is modest, not too prominent, and like
the dynamics makes its presence known primarily in the final movement; and the
treble is a bit soft. Moreover, there is a reasonable sense of depth to set off
the realism of the sonic picture, particularly evident in the SACD layer.
One small quibble in closing: At only a bit over half an
hour, the Second Symphony most often
these days comes coupled with more music than we find here, sometimes with
another Tchaikovsky symphony. Even with the first-movement coupling the total
playing time amounts to little more than forty-eight minutes for the entire
album. It seems rather short value, given the price of the disc.
JJP
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comment. It will be published after review.