Of Mahler’s nine, ten, or ten-and-a-half symphonies (take
your pick), it’s the Seventh that
often gets the least love. Along with the Fifth
and Sixth Symphonies, the Seventh
forms a middle trio of Mahler symphonies, all of them purely orchestral, with
the Seventh being the oddest of the
group. Even more so than most of Mahler’s works, its five movements are open to
multiple interpretations, and with seemingly every conductor on the planet
having recorded them, we get a variety of readings. I remember one critic long
ago explaining that the symphony was a recounting by Mahler of his trip to the
countryside, complete with his packing of suitcases, traveling along rural
roads, along pastures, and on to his destination. Other critics see its five
movements more generally as a journey from dusk until dawn or a nightly walk
into morning, a kind of eccentric, extended nocturne.
This Arte Nova reissue of the Seventh from conductor Adrian Leaper performing the work with the
Gran Canaria Philharmonic Orchestra brings us yet another realization of the
music, this one at low cost. At best, however, I would describe Leaper’s
performance as cautious. It’s certainly sturdy and straightforward, but not
entirely distinctive.
Austrian composer and conductor Gustav Mahler (1860-1911)
wrote his Symphony No. 7 in E minor
in 1904-05, and admirers sometimes refer to it as Lied der Nacht (“Song of the Night”), probably in part because of
its two Nachtmusik (“Night Music”)
movements as well as its stylistic evocation of night.
Leaper opens the long first movement with an abundant
degree of atmosphere and then moves into the whirling night music with relative
ease. Mahler certainly intended it as a movement of contrasts, from its erratic
nervousness to its moments of extreme stillness, and Leaper makes the
transitions well enough, if not so memorably.
My own favorite performance of the Seventh Symphony is by Bernard Haitink in an old Philips analogue
recording now out of print. Haitink, too, might face the criticism of being too
straightforward, but he had the magnificent Concertgebouw Orchestra working
with him, making the music glisten and shine like the stars. By comparison,
Leaper’s Gran Canaria Philharmonic is merely competent.
Of the two Nachtmusik
movements that flank the central Scherzo,
the first one is more jaunty, a march into the night, and the second a more
serene serenade. Leaper takes both of them almost perfunctorily; they’re still
curiously lovely, just not particularly distinguished. I would like to have
heard either a little more of Mahler or a little more of Leaper in this music.
Instead, it’s all a bit detached and bland.
Leaper’s handling of the Scherzo, while not as imaginative or energetic as I’ve heard, is
probably the best thing about the performance. The conductor creates and
sustains typically bizarre Mahlerian moods that range from humorous to
grotesque to sinister.
The lively, vigorous finale brings us back into daylight,
and whether Mahler meant for us to take it in a positive manner or ironically
is anybody’s guess. Surely, “the dawn comes up like thunder,” as Kipling wrote.
This final chapter is mainly light and cheery, which is what we hear from
Leaper and his forces, with some mild grandeur along the way. Mahler and Leaper
end the work in a brief, shining moment of glory that remains quite satisfying.
Arte Nova made the recording in 1995 at the “La Nave,” El
Cebadal, Los Palmas de Gran Canaria, about a year after Maestro Leaper took
over as Chief Conductor of the Filarmonica. The sound, miked at a moderate
distance, displays a fairly good depth of field, a favoring of the upper
midrange in the frequency balance, and a slight edge to the strings. The
dynamic range and impact could be stronger, clarity greater, bass deeper, and
resonance less. So, while the sonics are not at all bad, they are, like
Leaper’s performance, sort of middle-of-the-road. Even the cowbells sound
barely audible in the distance.
JJP
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comment. It will be published after review.