Dec 30, 2010

Rimsky-Korsakov: Scheherazade (CD review)

Also, Borodin: Symphony No. 2. Kiril Kondrashin, Concertgebouw Orchestra. Philips 475 7570.

Recorded in 1979, Kondrashin's performance of Scheherazade is one of my favorites in this work, the others coming from Reiner (RCA or JVC), Haitink (Philips), and Beecham (EMI), with Kletzki (on a hard-to-find EMI Eminence) and Mackerras (Telarc) not far behind. This Philips Kondrashin disc also marks the fourth incarnation of the recording I've owned: one LP and three CD's. I'm not sure I didn't like it best on LP, but this 96kHz/24-bit Philips "Originals" release is undoubtedly the best-sounding of the Kondrashin CD's.

Kondrashin's way with the work is big, robust, and energetic, yet even-tempered, too, the conductor filling out all the varied contrasts in the work from soft to loud, serene to bombastic, in equal measure. It is probably the best all-around interpretation one can find, even if it doesn't score high in any single area. For instance, I think Haitink beats him in poetic beauty; Beecham beats him in sparkle and charm; and Reiner beats him in excitement and sonics (especially in the audiophile-quality JVC XRCD edition). But there is no discounting Kondrashin's reasoned, rational, levelheaded approach to the music. This, incidentally, is in contrast to Valery Gergiev's more-recent Kiev recording (also on Philips), which I found too erratic. Kondrashin makes the four movements of the piece more of a whole, the entire work hanging together better as a single composition rather than appearing like a series of unrelated tone poems.

I wish I could say the same thing of the coupling, though, the Borodin Second Symphony, which Kondrashin recorded a year later in 1980 with the Concertgebouw. It seems as though it's more in the Gergiev Scheherazade style, rather too boisterous and mercurial for my taste. But, then, I'm used to the refined, yet stimulating Borodin Second Symphony recording made years ago by Jean Martinon for Decca.

On the Rimsky-Korsakov tracks, the sound of this 2006 reissue at first didn't seem any different to me than my oldest of Kondrashin CD recording; then, after numerous comparisons, instantly switching back and forth between two CD players, I began to detect a couple of minor things: The 24-bit edition (originally remastered in 2001 and here appearing for the second time) is subtly smoother and maybe, just maybe, a touch more dynamic. Nevertheless, the differences are so small that I couldn't really recommend the disc to people who already own either of the earlier versions. This newest edition is still lush, plush, and as radiant than ever, and it will not disappoint many listeners. The Borodin, recorded live, is brighter and noisier than the Rimsky-Korsakov, with more of a small background hiss noticeable at times. I'd buy it for the Scheherazade music foremost.

JJP

4 comments:

  1. 1. No 24 bits remastering in 2001
    2. No Borodin 2 on this edition of the CD.

    Sorry.

    ReplyDelete
  2. barefoot,

    I'm holding in my hand the 2006 re-issued disc reviewed here and reading from the back cover: "Alexander Borodin (1833-1887) Symphony No. 2 in B minor." And from the front and back covers: "96kHz, 24-bit Remastering." Sorry. Don't know where you got your information.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Weird, I have the 2006 edition and... no Borodin. Go figure. A bootleg? Now is far too late to return it. I don't even remember where it came from.

    Sorry about the inconvenience.

    By the way, someone posted your review at:

    http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Rimsky-Korsakov%3A+Scheherazade%3B+Borodin%3A+Symphony+No.+2.-a0167626463

    without mentioning the author.

    Thank you for your instructive reviews.


    ReplyDelete
  4. Research/listen on Amazon UK:

    1996 Scheherazade + Symphony No. 2 + Capriccio Espagnol + Russian Easter Festival

    2001."96kHz, 24-bit Remastering, Scheherazade + Symphony No. 2, picture on front totally different from 1996

    2006."96kHz, 24-bit Remastering, Scheherazade + Symphony No. 2 picture on front made bigger

    All samples sounded hissy, perhaps the 1996 less so ironically

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for your comment. It will be published after review.